“Kein Operationsplan reicht mit einiger Sicherheit über das erste Zusammentreffen mit der feindlichen Hauptmacht hinaus.”-

"No plan of operations extends with any certainty beyond the first encounter with the main body of the enemy."- Helmuth von Moltke
Historians continue to debate if the Schieffen Plan was successful, but historians argue that Germany did not follow the exact plan accordingly. German Generals had to make decisions on the battlefield that did not align with the plan, which caused other problems, such as sustaining their advantage on the Western Front because of the transfer of resources to Austria-Hungary. Time was not on the German side, where they continued to bleed manpower and resources at an alarming rate. The Schieffen Plan provided short-term gains, and strategically, it was a deadlock.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

 Correct because negotiations become trapped between idealism and realism. Idealism is working on a peaceful solution. Realism is the reality of the situation. One example is Hitler and the Munich agreement, which gave him part of Czechoslovakia, where he promised not to take any more territory. Similar to Putin's plans in Ukraine.
Read more
 " The shells were not there. The men at the front were not to blame. The generals were not to blame. The blame lay entirely with the system, which had governed the supply of munitions." - David Lloyd George, House of Commons Speech, 1915 During the shell crisis of 1915, arms manufacturers were private with limited government oversight. An issue was raised concerning the thirty percent of shells that did not explode. Effective artillery bombardments were vital to winning the war. If a shell did not explode, trenches were not destroyed, which enabled the enemy to regroup and counterattack. Without effective shelling during an attack, troops faced more casualties. An example is the Battle of Loos. The economy was also affected because of the cost of raw materials, including manpower and metals. Additional costs were in the logistics of the war, where the transportation, labor, and handling of shells that were duds cost millions of dollars. Therefore, Britain established the Min...
Read more
  As a war artist, Maurice Busset's interpretation of the conflicts he participated in should not be underestimated. Paintings give some viewers a deeper interpretation of the trials and tribulations society and soldiers had to endure during the First World War. Therefore, art can represent the human side of the horrors that were related to the First World War, where soldiers and their society's sacrifice can be felt through his artwork. Busset's Paintings, the major aces, ensure the sacrifice and the heroism that many had to face during the conflict will be remembered for future generations. Therefore, Maurice Busset made an everlasting contribution to the art world that will ensure veterans and society during the First World War will be remembered. Reply
Read more