The article reveals the challenges Germany had with heavy weapons such as the MG08, which played a pivotal role in World War 1. However, the MG08 was difficult to repair and transport. These flaws gave an advantage to the British with their production of the British Vickers gun. In modern warfare, such as the conflict in Ukraine, there has been an improvement in heavy weaponry and accuracy. Ukraine uses the AK74 and the light machine gun, such as the PKM, which is air-cooled and light. Russia uses the PKP Pecheneg machine gun, which is still heavy but more reliable than the MG08 because of the forced air-cooled barrel, which eliminates

Reply

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

 Correct because negotiations become trapped between idealism and realism. Idealism is working on a peaceful solution. Realism is the reality of the situation. One example is Hitler and the Munich agreement, which gave him part of Czechoslovakia, where he promised not to take any more territory. Similar to Putin's plans in Ukraine.
Read more
 " The shells were not there. The men at the front were not to blame. The generals were not to blame. The blame lay entirely with the system, which had governed the supply of munitions." - David Lloyd George, House of Commons Speech, 1915 During the shell crisis of 1915, arms manufacturers were private with limited government oversight. An issue was raised concerning the thirty percent of shells that did not explode. Effective artillery bombardments were vital to winning the war. If a shell did not explode, trenches were not destroyed, which enabled the enemy to regroup and counterattack. Without effective shelling during an attack, troops faced more casualties. An example is the Battle of Loos. The economy was also affected because of the cost of raw materials, including manpower and metals. Additional costs were in the logistics of the war, where the transportation, labor, and handling of shells that were duds cost millions of dollars. Therefore, Britain established the Min...
Read more
  As a war artist, Maurice Busset's interpretation of the conflicts he participated in should not be underestimated. Paintings give some viewers a deeper interpretation of the trials and tribulations society and soldiers had to endure during the First World War. Therefore, art can represent the human side of the horrors that were related to the First World War, where soldiers and their society's sacrifice can be felt through his artwork. Busset's Paintings, the major aces, ensure the sacrifice and the heroism that many had to face during the conflict will be remembered for future generations. Therefore, Maurice Busset made an everlasting contribution to the art world that will ensure veterans and society during the First World War will be remembered. Reply
Read more